WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.320 --> 00:00:03.879
To listen ad free, visit sinspod dot co slash subscribe
2
00:00:04.080 --> 00:00:06.000
starting at two ninety nine a month. You'll also get
3
00:00:06.040 --> 00:00:08.839
access to our exclusive bonus content episodes when you join
4
00:00:08.919 --> 00:00:12.679
through Patreon or Apple subscriptions. Thanks for supporting the show.
5
00:00:14.800 --> 00:00:18.120
For nearly thirty years. Ron Mortensen said the jury never
6
00:00:18.160 --> 00:00:21.760
heard the full story. He said Christopher Brady was protected,
7
00:00:22.199 --> 00:00:25.199
that the evidence had been mishandled, and that the state
8
00:00:25.280 --> 00:00:27.719
askedurors to trust a man who had every reason to
9
00:00:27.760 --> 00:00:31.879
save himself. In some ways, he was right, but.
10
00:00:31.839 --> 00:00:34.759
A trial can have real flaws without making a convicted
11
00:00:34.799 --> 00:00:37.600
man innocent, and a guilty man can use the truth
12
00:00:38.039 --> 00:00:41.759
about someone else's misconduct to turn himself into the victim
13
00:00:42.159 --> 00:00:45.479
for Daniel's murder. The legal questions are complicated, but the
14
00:00:45.560 --> 00:00:48.079
moral questions remain painfully clear.
15
00:00:56.359 --> 00:00:59.119
Hi, and welcome to Sins and Survivors, a Las Vegas
16
00:00:59.159 --> 00:01:03.119
true crime podcast where we focus on missing persons, unsolved cases,
17
00:01:03.439 --> 00:01:05.359
and the number one cause of homicide in the Las
18
00:01:05.439 --> 00:01:08.760
Vegas area, domestic violence. I'm your host Sean.
19
00:01:08.640 --> 00:01:09.760
And I'm your co host John.
20
00:01:10.359 --> 00:01:12.799
Welcome to part seven of our series on the murder
21
00:01:12.799 --> 00:01:15.640
of Daniel Mendoza. If you have not listened to parts
22
00:01:15.680 --> 00:01:18.719
one through six, yet we strongly recommend going back and
23
00:01:18.760 --> 00:01:21.519
starting there. This is a case where the details build
24
00:01:21.560 --> 00:01:23.640
on each other, and at this point in the story
25
00:01:23.760 --> 00:01:26.480
we are deep in the legal aftermath. We recommend you
26
00:01:26.519 --> 00:01:30.879
start at sinspod dot Co Slash one twenty nine. Last week,
27
00:01:30.920 --> 00:01:34.760
we talked about what happened after Ron Mortenson's conviction, Ramone's
28
00:01:34.760 --> 00:01:39.159
civil lawsuit, the fight for civilian police oversight, Christopher Brady's
29
00:01:39.159 --> 00:01:42.680
attempt to return to law enforcement, and Ramone's devastating statement
30
00:01:42.719 --> 00:01:46.239
that years later, police were still harassing his youngest son.
31
00:01:47.400 --> 00:01:50.319
Part six was about whether Las Vegas really changed after
32
00:01:50.400 --> 00:01:54.359
Daniel's murder. This week, we turned back to Ron Mortenson.
33
00:01:55.239 --> 00:01:58.640
While the city debated reform, while Christopher Brady faced a
34
00:01:58.680 --> 00:02:02.480
federal civil rights case, while Daniel's family fought for accountability
35
00:02:02.480 --> 00:02:05.879
in a civil suit. Mortenson kept insisting that he was
36
00:02:05.920 --> 00:02:08.759
not the man who fired the shots. In the years
37
00:02:08.800 --> 00:02:10.879
that followed, some of the points he made in his
38
00:02:10.919 --> 00:02:12.759
appeals raised real questions.
39
00:02:13.199 --> 00:02:15.240
Before we go any further, we want to be clear
40
00:02:15.280 --> 00:02:18.919
about where we are coming from, based on the eyewitness testimony,
41
00:02:18.960 --> 00:02:21.439
the physical evidence, the position of the men in the
42
00:02:21.439 --> 00:02:24.719
truck and the fact that the murder weapon was Mortenson's gone.
43
00:02:25.000 --> 00:02:27.560
We believe the jury did not make a mistake in
44
00:02:27.639 --> 00:02:32.680
convicting Ron Mortensen for Daniel Mendoza's murder. However, we also
45
00:02:32.719 --> 00:02:35.400
believe that Christopher Brady should have been prosecuted for his
46
00:02:35.599 --> 00:02:39.960
role in what happened that night. Brady's misconduct doesn't make
47
00:02:40.120 --> 00:02:43.599
Mortenson innocent, but the decision not to charge Brady left
48
00:02:43.599 --> 00:02:46.120
a space in this case for doubt to seep in.
49
00:02:47.599 --> 00:02:50.319
All The unanswered questions about Brady and the flaws and
50
00:02:50.360 --> 00:02:54.719
the investigation became part of Mortenson's argument and another reason
51
00:02:54.759 --> 00:02:56.960
to say the jury had not heard the full story.
52
00:02:58.039 --> 00:03:02.439
Mortenson's appeals painted him as a victim of Metro from
53
00:03:02.520 --> 00:03:06.080
the beginning. His defense was built on one claim Christopher
54
00:03:06.159 --> 00:03:09.439
Brady was the shooter and Metro protected Brady because he
55
00:03:09.759 --> 00:03:13.560
was connected. That argument kept coming back year after year,
56
00:03:13.919 --> 00:03:16.479
motion after motion, hearing after hearing.
57
00:03:17.719 --> 00:03:20.599
Just a quick recap, we believe that the state's case
58
00:03:20.639 --> 00:03:25.199
against Mortenson was not weak. At trial, Prosecutors had eyewitnesses
59
00:03:25.240 --> 00:03:28.039
who described the shooter as being the passenger in the truck,
60
00:03:28.479 --> 00:03:32.080
a larger white man wearing glasses. Mortenson was admittedly sitting
61
00:03:32.120 --> 00:03:34.680
in the passenger seat, and he was larger than Brady
62
00:03:34.800 --> 00:03:38.000
and wore glasses. The gun that fired the fatal shots
63
00:03:38.159 --> 00:03:41.960
was Mortensen's sig Sour. According to the state's firearm expert,
64
00:03:42.360 --> 00:03:45.000
the physical evidence supported the theory that the gun had
65
00:03:45.000 --> 00:03:47.360
been fired from outside of the passenger side of the truck,
66
00:03:47.840 --> 00:03:49.719
and that it was likely the truck was moving when
67
00:03:49.759 --> 00:03:53.919
the shots were fired. Mortenson never accepted the jury's verdict.
68
00:03:54.639 --> 00:03:57.879
At sentencing, he apologized to Daniel's family, but he still
69
00:03:57.919 --> 00:04:01.400
maintained that Brady was the shooter. He stated in court
70
00:04:01.439 --> 00:04:04.560
that he was a scapegoat for years of misconduct inside Metro,
71
00:04:05.000 --> 00:04:07.520
the rookie officer chosen to take the fall for the
72
00:04:07.560 --> 00:04:12.599
department's larger problems. That word scapegoat became central to the
73
00:04:12.599 --> 00:04:16.360
way Mortensen presented himself for the next thirty years. In
74
00:04:16.399 --> 00:04:18.759
August of nineteen ninety eight, more than a year after
75
00:04:18.800 --> 00:04:22.839
Mortenson's conviction, Frank Kremin was preparing the first major appeal,
76
00:04:23.279 --> 00:04:25.639
and the argument was essentially the same one he had
77
00:04:25.680 --> 00:04:28.800
made a trial. The jury, he said, had not heard
78
00:04:28.800 --> 00:04:31.959
the full story about Christopher Brady and about the evidence
79
00:04:32.000 --> 00:04:35.480
that might have made the state's key witness look very different.
80
00:04:36.240 --> 00:04:39.040
One of the clearest examples was Brady's truck. As we
81
00:04:39.079 --> 00:04:41.560
have already discussed, the truck was a critical piece of
82
00:04:41.600 --> 00:04:44.399
evidence for both sides because the case turned on what
83
00:04:44.560 --> 00:04:47.439
was physically possible for Brady to do or to not
84
00:04:47.560 --> 00:04:51.439
do while inside the cab, but also, since Brady had
85
00:04:51.439 --> 00:04:54.560
control of his truck, he had made modifications to it
86
00:04:54.600 --> 00:04:57.839
before the trial started. While it was eventually restored to
87
00:04:57.879 --> 00:04:59.639
the way it looked the night of the murder. As
88
00:04:59.680 --> 00:05:03.199
we dis discussed, that just led to more unanswered questions
89
00:05:03.240 --> 00:05:05.199
and cast more suspicion on Brady.
90
00:05:06.240 --> 00:05:09.240
On appeal, Kremen argued that the changes to the truck
91
00:05:09.519 --> 00:05:12.959
mattered because they made it harder to test visibility movement
92
00:05:13.160 --> 00:05:15.639
and whether Brady could have reached across the cab in
93
00:05:15.680 --> 00:05:18.920
a way that Mortenson described. He later summed up the
94
00:05:18.920 --> 00:05:21.879
defense's frustration by saying that after a lot of effort,
95
00:05:22.079 --> 00:05:24.560
the truck was finally delivered to him, but it was
96
00:05:24.560 --> 00:05:29.040
delivered late and changed, with the tint removed, the clothing laundered,
97
00:05:29.079 --> 00:05:32.199
and the seat already taken out. Then he asked the
98
00:05:32.279 --> 00:05:34.839
question that became the theme of the appeal, who was
99
00:05:34.879 --> 00:05:37.639
telling the truth. The courts did not agree that the
100
00:05:37.720 --> 00:05:40.040
changes to the truck were enough to overturn the verdict.
101
00:05:40.600 --> 00:05:43.199
The jury had seen the truck with the custom seat reinstalled,
102
00:05:43.839 --> 00:05:46.639
jurors were allowed to sit inside it, and the defense
103
00:05:46.720 --> 00:05:48.879
was able to argue that Brady could have reached across
104
00:05:48.879 --> 00:05:51.439
the cab if the seat was positioned in a certain way.
105
00:05:52.319 --> 00:05:55.680
Later courts concluded that Mortensen had not shown enough prejudice
106
00:05:55.959 --> 00:05:58.439
that the changes to the truck justified a new trial.
107
00:05:59.279 --> 00:06:02.279
But even though the legal argument failed, the optics were
108
00:06:02.319 --> 00:06:06.120
still terrible. Even though the messy investigation does not erase
109
00:06:06.120 --> 00:06:09.120
the eyewitness as another evidence, they created an opening, and
110
00:06:09.199 --> 00:06:12.800
because Brady was never prosecuted, every flaw around Brady became
111
00:06:12.839 --> 00:06:15.480
something Mortenson could point to and say, this is why
112
00:06:15.480 --> 00:06:16.439
you should have believed me.
113
00:06:16.600 --> 00:06:19.759
Instead, that same argument applied to the evidence the jury
114
00:06:19.759 --> 00:06:23.680
did not hear or heard only partially about Brady himself.
115
00:06:24.240 --> 00:06:26.519
Since Brady was the witness the state chose to build
116
00:06:26.560 --> 00:06:29.480
their case around, his credibility became one of the most
117
00:06:29.519 --> 00:06:34.120
important issues in Mortenson's appeals. As we discussed in Part five,
118
00:06:34.639 --> 00:06:38.600
excluded or limited evidence admitted about Brady involved internal affairs
119
00:06:38.639 --> 00:06:43.199
complaints and allegations about Brady's conduct as an officer, including
120
00:06:43.240 --> 00:06:45.600
claims that he had pulled a gun on people or
121
00:06:45.720 --> 00:06:50.639
roughed people up. Some of those allegations were unproven, and
122
00:06:50.680 --> 00:06:53.399
the trial judge limited them because the court did not
123
00:06:53.439 --> 00:06:56.279
find them reliable enough or relevant enough to put in
124
00:06:56.279 --> 00:07:00.279
front of the jury. There was also Carrie Morris had
125
00:07:00.279 --> 00:07:03.519
accused Brady of sexual misconduct during a traffic stop, an
126
00:07:03.560 --> 00:07:06.639
allegation that was never charged and the prosecutors viewed with
127
00:07:06.680 --> 00:07:11.199
credibility concerns. But after Mortenson's conviction, it became clear that
128
00:07:11.240 --> 00:07:15.079
Morris had described Brady using language that sounded strikingly similar
129
00:07:15.399 --> 00:07:19.920
to something Mortenson claimed Brady said after Daniel's shooting. Mortenson
130
00:07:20.000 --> 00:07:22.800
testified that Brady told him I told you I was
131
00:07:22.839 --> 00:07:26.639
an evil man. I am evil. Morris said that Brady
132
00:07:26.639 --> 00:07:30.319
had used similar language with her for the defense. That
133
00:07:30.399 --> 00:07:33.199
mattered because it was such an unusual phrase, and if
134
00:07:33.199 --> 00:07:37.079
Mortenson had made up the evil man line, Morris's separate
135
00:07:37.079 --> 00:07:40.120
account could look like corroboration of at least that part
136
00:07:40.160 --> 00:07:43.600
of his story. It is another element to show that
137
00:07:43.639 --> 00:07:46.199
the jury had not heard everything that might have changed
138
00:07:46.240 --> 00:07:50.759
how they understood Christopher Brady. However, the courts were not persuaded,
139
00:07:51.279 --> 00:07:53.879
finding that Morris's statement did not have a close enough
140
00:07:53.879 --> 00:07:57.160
connection to Daniel's murder and probably would not have produced
141
00:07:57.160 --> 00:07:59.920
a different result at a new trial. But for Morton
142
00:08:00.079 --> 00:08:03.000
since supporters, it became one more piece of the same
143
00:08:03.079 --> 00:08:05.639
larger claim that the state had asked the jury to
144
00:08:05.680 --> 00:08:08.680
trust Brady without letting the jury see the full picture
145
00:08:09.000 --> 00:08:10.279
of who Brady might have been.
146
00:08:11.800 --> 00:08:15.879
The prosecution had a similar issue with Mark Barry. During
147
00:08:15.920 --> 00:08:19.160
Mortenson's trial in nineteen ninety seven, Frank Kremen said he
148
00:08:19.240 --> 00:08:23.600
received an anonymous call about Christopher Brady. The caller claimed
149
00:08:23.639 --> 00:08:26.360
that Brady had once told fellow officer Mark Barry that
150
00:08:26.439 --> 00:08:30.439
he wanted to do a drive by shooting. At the time,
151
00:08:30.560 --> 00:08:34.559
prosecutors said an investigator had spoken with Barry and Barry
152
00:08:34.600 --> 00:08:37.399
had called the allegation nonsense, so the jury never heard it.
153
00:08:38.679 --> 00:08:42.000
In July of nineteen ninety eight, though after Mortensen had
154
00:08:42.039 --> 00:08:45.679
been convicted, Mark Barry testified before a federal grand jury
155
00:08:45.679 --> 00:08:50.480
investigating possible civil rights violations in Daniel's death. As you
156
00:08:50.559 --> 00:08:53.480
might recall from our earlier episode, Barry testified to that
157
00:08:53.559 --> 00:08:57.240
grand jury that Brady had mentioned doing a drive by
158
00:08:57.720 --> 00:09:01.720
more than once, but he didn't take Brady serious. Essentially,
159
00:09:01.759 --> 00:09:04.879
what he said was that once this thing Brady had
160
00:09:04.960 --> 00:09:07.679
joked about actually happened, he'd put two and two together.
161
00:09:08.919 --> 00:09:11.799
That testimony became a major appellate issue because it went
162
00:09:11.840 --> 00:09:16.559
directly to Brady's credibility and possibly to his motive. In
163
00:09:16.600 --> 00:09:18.879
August of nineteen ninety eight, the issue is serious enough
164
00:09:18.919 --> 00:09:23.320
that District Judge Joseph Pavlikowski ordered an evidentiary hearing to
165
00:09:23.399 --> 00:09:27.840
determine whether Mortenson deserved a new trial. Legal experts quoted
166
00:09:27.840 --> 00:09:30.240
at the time said that if Barry's testimony was credible,
167
00:09:30.320 --> 00:09:33.720
it could be important. It could raise serious questions about Brady,
168
00:09:34.080 --> 00:09:36.519
not just as a bad witness, but as a person
169
00:09:36.759 --> 00:09:38.840
who may have talked about doing the very type of
170
00:09:38.879 --> 00:09:43.559
crime that later happened. The ACLU of Nevada also weighed in.
171
00:09:44.080 --> 00:09:46.759
Gary Peck said he didn't want to prejudge the case,
172
00:09:47.120 --> 00:09:49.919
but if the accounts of the federal grand jury testimony
173
00:09:49.960 --> 00:09:53.559
were accurate, Mortenson should have an opportunity for the evidence
174
00:09:53.600 --> 00:09:54.080
to come out.
175
00:09:55.039 --> 00:09:58.039
In October of nineteen ninety eight, the hearing on Mortenson's
176
00:09:58.080 --> 00:10:00.120
request for a new trial was held in front of
177
00:10:00.159 --> 00:10:04.240
District Judge Joseph Pavlkowski. Frank Kremin leaned into the testimony
178
00:10:04.279 --> 00:10:07.799
from officer Mark Barry. Barry did not say Brady had
179
00:10:07.799 --> 00:10:10.559
ever laid out a specific plan, and he described the
180
00:10:10.600 --> 00:10:13.080
comments as the kind of thing said while drinking, joking,
181
00:10:13.200 --> 00:10:17.480
blowing off steam, and talking about work. However, Barry was
182
00:10:17.519 --> 00:10:20.519
not the only officer whose testimony raised questions about the
183
00:10:20.559 --> 00:10:25.039
culture in Metro. Another officer testified that Brady and other
184
00:10:25.080 --> 00:10:29.000
officers sometimes talked about certain neighborhoods, including the area near
185
00:10:29.080 --> 00:10:32.360
McKellar's Circle, as if they were filled with worthless or
186
00:10:32.399 --> 00:10:36.200
bad people. A former officer, William Butler, said some of
187
00:10:36.240 --> 00:10:40.240
those conversations were jokes or venting after stressful shifts, but
188
00:10:40.279 --> 00:10:43.000
he also described talk about certain areas needing to be
189
00:10:43.120 --> 00:10:46.799
napalmed and jokes about contract hits to wipe out certain
190
00:10:46.840 --> 00:10:51.519
people in certain neighborhoods. For Kremen, this all suggested that
191
00:10:51.600 --> 00:10:54.759
Daniel's neighborhood was not just a random place Brady and
192
00:10:54.799 --> 00:10:57.840
Mortensen ended up in that night, but a place some
193
00:10:58.000 --> 00:11:01.240
officers had already talked about with content. We're going to
194
00:11:01.279 --> 00:11:03.240
pause here for a quick break, but we'll be right
195
00:11:03.279 --> 00:11:05.879
back to discuss an issue with the physical evidence that
196
00:11:05.960 --> 00:11:07.960
we haven't yet talked about during this series.
197
00:11:08.559 --> 00:11:12.039
Tory Johnson, the police firearms expert, had been one of
198
00:11:12.080 --> 00:11:15.960
the major witnesses at Mortenson's trial. Johnson had written notes
199
00:11:16.039 --> 00:11:18.200
during the trial that were apparently not turned over to
200
00:11:18.200 --> 00:11:21.399
the defense until later through attorneys involved in the Mendoza
201
00:11:21.480 --> 00:11:25.360
family's civil lawsuit that we discussed last week. Johnson's notes
202
00:11:25.759 --> 00:11:29.360
involved the fatal bullet. Because the bullet that killed Daniel
203
00:11:29.440 --> 00:11:32.679
passed through his body and was never recovered, Johnson had
204
00:11:32.679 --> 00:11:35.240
written notes speculating about whether the bullet might have come
205
00:11:35.480 --> 00:11:38.480
from a gun more powerful than Mortenson's three eighty sig
206
00:11:38.559 --> 00:11:42.399
sour to Kremen. That opened the door to another question,
207
00:11:42.840 --> 00:11:45.159
whether the jury had heard everything it should have heard
208
00:11:45.200 --> 00:11:49.679
about the ballistics evidence. Johnson testified that he had been
209
00:11:49.720 --> 00:11:52.519
concerned about the issue during the trial, but he also
210
00:11:52.639 --> 00:11:54.679
denied that he meant that the three to eighty could
211
00:11:54.679 --> 00:11:57.799
not have fired the fatal shot. He explained that the
212
00:11:57.840 --> 00:12:00.519
caliber of the bullet cannot necessarily be to herman from
213
00:12:00.519 --> 00:12:03.720
the size of a wound, and prosecutors argued that the
214
00:12:03.759 --> 00:12:06.759
new ballistics questions did not amount to a new theory
215
00:12:06.799 --> 00:12:11.080
of the murder. Deputy District Attorney Gary Gyman argued that
216
00:12:11.120 --> 00:12:13.879
none of the new material justified a new trial. He
217
00:12:13.919 --> 00:12:16.080
said the state's case had been supported by five eye
218
00:12:16.120 --> 00:12:19.519
witnesses and was not built solely on Brady's credibility. It
219
00:12:19.559 --> 00:12:21.759
was not enough to undo the jury's verdict.
220
00:12:22.960 --> 00:12:25.399
At the end of the hearing, Judge Pavlikowski took the
221
00:12:25.440 --> 00:12:28.600
matter under advisement. As Mortensen was let out of the
222
00:12:28.600 --> 00:12:32.159
courtroom in chains, he silently made his own argument for
223
00:12:32.200 --> 00:12:34.919
the press and the cameras in the courtroom. According to
224
00:12:34.919 --> 00:12:37.720
the Review Journal, he flashed a sign with the words
225
00:12:38.240 --> 00:12:43.159
metro political prisoner. That image captured the appeal in one strange,
226
00:12:43.240 --> 00:12:47.679
uncomfortable moment, legitimate questions being raised inside the courtroom while
227
00:12:47.720 --> 00:12:50.000
Mortensen tried to cast himself as the victim of a
228
00:12:50.000 --> 00:12:55.440
police department conspiracy. Later that month, Judge Pavlkowski denied Mortenson's
229
00:12:55.440 --> 00:12:58.360
request for a new trial, but the very issue did
230
00:12:58.360 --> 00:13:02.000
not go away. Mortenson took the argument to the Nevada
231
00:13:02.039 --> 00:13:05.639
Supreme Court, where the justices later agreed that Barry's testimony
232
00:13:05.759 --> 00:13:09.600
had not been discoverable with reasonable diligence before trial, but
233
00:13:09.679 --> 00:13:12.120
still concluded that it was not likely to produce a
234
00:13:12.120 --> 00:13:15.799
different result. So the door stayed closed at least for then.
235
00:13:16.879 --> 00:13:19.240
But the argument had been preserved, and the same question
236
00:13:19.279 --> 00:13:22.159
would keep following the case for decades. If Brady was
237
00:13:22.159 --> 00:13:24.559
the state's key witness, how much did the jury have
238
00:13:24.600 --> 00:13:26.919
the right to know about what he allegedly said and
239
00:13:26.960 --> 00:13:29.759
done before deciding whether to believe him.
240
00:13:30.080 --> 00:13:33.039
In nineteen ninety nine, Mortenson brought forth a challenge based
241
00:13:33.039 --> 00:13:36.840
on one of the witnesses against him, Reuben Ramirez, during
242
00:13:36.840 --> 00:13:39.120
the trial in nineteen ninety seven, Ramirez was one of
243
00:13:39.159 --> 00:13:42.639
the eyewitnesses who identified Mortenson as the shooter. He had